Posts Tagged ‘immigration reform’

Obama’s National Security Strategy Acknowledges the Contributions of Immigrants

Tuesday, August 3rd, 2010

The foundation of any country’s national security is its economy.

With a weakening economy in the U.S, particularly while the economies of China and India continue to grow, America’s national security is at risk.

As Edward Alden, a Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations writes,

“The engine of that economic growth is innovation, the capacity of Americans to be the first to invent, design and reap the profits from the next generation of technologies that will transform the way we live. As President Obama put it in his introduction to the strategy paper: “Simply put, we must see American innovation as a foundation of American power.”

That’s where immigration comes in.

In his “National Security Strategy” recently delivered to Congress, President Obama makes the argument that the strength of America’s economy (and by extension, its national security) depends in no small measure on America’s ability to act as a magnet for the world’s innovators, entrepreneurs, and highly-skilled talent.

Alden writes,

“The National Security Strategy (NSS), which is sent to Congress every four years, is designed to lay out in broad terms the administration’s philosophy on what is needed to protect the vital interests of the United States. It generally focuses on short and long-term military and other security threats. The most famous NSS, which was released by the Bush administration in 2002, created the rationale for the subsequent invasion of Iraq by stating that the United States would act to pre-empt potential security threats.

That’s the only way in which immigration has ever figured in previous administration strategy papers – as a threat. Most have made some passing reference to the need to control illegal immigration. The Clinton administration’s first strategy paper also warned that American openness to immigration raised the danger of economic espionage. The Bush NSS of 2002 was entirely silent on the issue.

But the Obama administration’s strategy shows a deeper understanding of the contribution of immigrants to America’s national security. The paper, for the first time, places immigration reform in the broader context of U.S. national interests. It starts with an obvious but all too often overlooked point: that America’s economy is the foundation of its national security. The United States will be unable to meet its security and political commitments around the world unless the economy recovers and grows more strongly in the future.

The engine of that economic growth is innovation, the capacity of Americans to be the first to invent, design and reap the profits from the next generation of technologies that will transform the way we live. As President Obama put it in his introduction to the strategy paper: “Simply put, we must see American innovation as a foundation of American power.”

That’s where immigration fits in. The United States has been alone among the world’s big powers in its ability to attract and retain the most talented immigrants from across the world, and it has been a remarkable windfall. Some 45 percent of the nation’s science and engineering Ph.D.s, and 65 percent of its computer science doctorates, are earned by students who were born abroad. America easily leads the world in the number of patents issued each year, and a quarter of those go to immigrant scientists and inventors, a hugely disproportionate number.

The Obama strategy, while hardly sanguine about the many economic challenges facing the United States, explicitly recognizes the strengths that come from such diversity. Immigration, the paper argues, must be part of the overall American strategy for strengthening its human capital. Improved schools, better science and math training, increased international education and exchange, and the reform of immigration laws are all part of a strategy to “ensure that the most innovative ideas take root in America.”

“Our ability to innovate, our ties to the world, and our economic prosperity depend on our nation’s capacity to welcome and assimilate immigrants,” the paper says.”

http://newamericamedia.org/2010/05/obamas-national-security-strategy-could-upend-immigration-debate.php

——————-

On a related note, I have co-written a paper on how a new immigration system could accelerate the American path to energy independence and greater national security by welcoming more of the world’s top energy scientists and researchers.

Many good proposals on fixing immigration to turbocharge America’s economy have been offered.

Congress, however, continues to play politics over sound policy and national interests.

For decades, Congress has declined to craft an immigration system that makes the American economy stronger.

While we wait for Congress to do its job on immigration reform, the American economy continues to sputter, Asian and oil-producing economies continue to strengthen, and the interests of national security take a back seat.

Will President Obama Help Rust Belt Economies with Immigration?

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

Tomorrow morning, President Obama is scheduled to give a speech at American University on the need for immigration reform as a means to support the economic recovery.

I can think of no more powerful message to the nation than that of the hard-working, struggling “rust belt” cities —- seeking a new beginning by embracing the new jobs and industries that come with the new immigrants.

This Associated Content article outlines the reasons why immigrants and immigration reform could help drive a revival in cities like Cleveland, Detroit, and Pittsburgh —- once great immigrant gateway cities, but today only a fraction of the population is foreign-born.

“”Cleveland Lawyer Says Immigrants Can Energize Rust Belt Economies,”  by Christopher Johnston:  http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2963878/cleveland_lawyer_says_immigrants_can.html?singlepage=true&cat=62

While to date the White House has not expressed support for any of these rust-belt/immigration initiatives, it might be time for President Obama to hear what some in these cities are saying.

Leadership in Detroit, Cleveland and Pittsburgh are beginning to embrace immigration-based economic development strategies to help reverse depopulation trends, to help accelerate the transition to a New Economy, and create the industries and jobs of the future for its residents.

Check out an exciting new initiative called “Global Detroit”  at the New Economy Initiative website:
http://neweconomyinitiative.cfsem.org/resources/research-library/global-detroit-study

For Cleveland, take a look at this: http://www.jewishcleveland.org/local_includes/downloads/42033.pdf
http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2010/06/flats_east_bank_project_receives_20_million_from_foreign_investors.html

http://www.immigrantinc.com/Future_Cleveland.pdf

For Pittsburgh:
http://www.pghtech.org/news-and-publications/teq/article.aspx?Article=1807 ; http://www.globalpittsburgh.org/communities/

High-skill immigration reform also is a pillar of the following policy position of a coalition of 30 Chambers of Commerce in the Great Lakes: “Agenda for Jobs and Economic Transformation in the Great Lakes Region,” page 7
http://www.glc.org/rap/docs/Great%20Lakes%20Business%20Agenda_021209.pdf

These chambers, from Chicago to Pittsburgh, are clearly stating that immigration helped create the once-great economy in the Great Lakes region —– and immigration is necessary once again for prosperity to return.

Mr. President, are you listening to the rust belt?

Why Immigrants Can Drive the Green Economy

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010

Raymond Spencer, an Australian‐born entrepreneur based in Chicago, has a window on the future–and a gusto for investing after founding a high‐technology consulting company that sold for more than $1 billion in 2006. “I have investments in maybe 10 start‐ups, all of which fall within a broad umbrella of a ‘green’ theme,” he said.

“And it’s interesting, the vast majority are either led by immigrants or have key technical people who are immigrants.”

It should come as no surprise that immigrants will help drive the green revolution. America’s young scientists and engineers, especially the ones drawn to emerging industries like alternative energy, tend to speak with an accent.

The 2000 Census found that immigrants, while accounting for 12 percent of the population, made up nearly half of the all scientists and engineers with doctorate degrees. Their importance will only grow. Nearly 70 percent of the men and women who entered the fields of science and engineering from 1995 to 2006 were immigrants.

Yet, the connection between immigration and the development and commercialization of alternative energy technology is rarely discussed. Policymakers envision millions of new jobs as the nation pursues renewable energy sources, like wind and solar power, and builds a smart grid to tap it.

But Dan Arvizu, the leading expert on solar power and the director of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy in Golden, Colorado, warns that much of the clean‐technology talent lies overseas, in nations that began pursuing alternative energy sources decades ago.

The 2000 Census found that immigrants, while accounting for 12 percent of the population, made up nearly half of the all scientists and engineers with doctorate degrees. Their importance will only grow.

Expanding our own clean‐tech industry will require working closely with foreign nations and foreign‐born scientists, he said. Immigration restrictions are making collaboration difficult. His lab’s efforts to work with a Chinese energy lab, for example, were stalled due to U.S. immigration barriers.

“We can’t get researchers over here,” Arvizu, the son of a once‐undocumented immigrant from Mexico, said in an interview in March 2009, his voice tinged with dismay. “It makes no sense to me. We need a much more enlightened approach.”

Dr. Zhao Gang, the Vice Director of the Renewable Energy and New Energy International Cooperation Planning Office of the Ministry of Science and Technology in China, says that America needs that enlightenment fast. “The Chinese government continues to impress upon the Obama administration that immigration restrictions are creating major impediments to U.S.‐China collaboration on clean energy development,” he said during a recent speech in Cleveland.

So what’s the problem? Some of it can be attributed to national security restrictions that impede international collaboration on clean energy. But Arvizu places greater weight on immigration barriers, suggesting that national secrecy is less important in the fast‐paced world of green‐tech development. “We are innovating so fast here, what we do today is often outdated tomorrow.

Finding solutions to alternative energy is a complex, global problem that requires global teamwork,” he said.

We need an immigration system that prioritizes the attraction and retention of scarce, high‐end talent needed to invent and commercialize alternative energy technology and other emerging technologies.

One idea we floated by Arvizu was a new immigrant “Energy Scientist Visa,” providing fast‐track green cards for Ph.D.s with the most promising energy research, as reviewed by a panel of top U.S. scientists. Arvizu enthusiastically responded, “Wow, that’s a brilliant idea.”

As the recent submission of the Startup Visa Act bill suggests, there’s really no shortage of good ideas of leveraging immigration to jumpstart the economy. The challenge is getting the American people to understand that high‐skill immigration creates jobs, that the current system is broken, and that action is required now.

We need an immigration system that prioritizes the attraction and retention of scarce, high‐end talent needed to invent and commercialize alternative energy technology and other emerging technologies.

For more on this, check out the new piece: “Why Immigrants Can Drive the Green Economy: Need for New Policy, Vision and Story Telling” by Robert L. Smith and myself.

http://immigrationpolicy.org/perspectives/why-immigrants-can-drive-green-economy